News and Document archive source
copyrighted material disclaimer at bottom of page

NewsMinepropogandacorporatemedia — Viewing Item


Clear channel organizes pro war rallies { March 26 2003 }

Original Source Link: (May no longer be active)
   http://www.iht.com/articles/90986.html

http://www.iht.com/articles/90986.html

Copyright 2003 The International Herald Tribune | www.iht.com

Paul Krugman: Behind pro-war protests, a company with ties to Bush
Paul Krugman
Wednesday, March 26, 2003

Channels of influence

NEW YORK By and large, recent pro-war rallies haven't drawn nearly as many people as anti-war rallies, but they have certainly been vehement.

One of the most striking took place after Natalie Maines, lead singer for the Dixie Chicks, criticized President George W. Bush: A crowd gathered in Louisiana to watch a tractor smash Dixie Chicks CDs, tapes and other paraphernalia. To those familiar with 20th-century history it seemed eerily reminiscent of ... But as Sinclair Lewis said, it can't happen here.

Who has been organizing those pro-war rallies? The answer, it turns out, is that they are being promoted by key players in the radio industry - with close links to the Bush administration.

The CD-smashing rally was organized by KRMD, part of Cumulus Media, a radio chain that has banned the Dixie Chicks from its playlists. Most of the pro-war demonstrations around the United States have, however, been organized by stations owned by Clear Channel Communications, a behemoth based in Texas that controls more than 1,200 stations and increasingly dominates the airwaves.

The company says the demonstrations, which go under the name Rally for America, reflect the initiative of individual stations. But this is unlikely: According to Eric Boehlert, who has written revelatory articles about Clear Channel in the online magazine Salon, the company is notorious - and widely hated - for its iron-fisted centralized control.

Until now, complaints about Clear Channel have focused on its business practices. Critics say it uses its power to squeeze recording companies and artists and contributes to the growing blandness of broadcast music. But now the company appears to be using its clout to help one side in a political dispute that deeply divides the United States.

Why would a media company insert itself into politics this way? It could simply be a matter of personal conviction on the part of management. But there are also good reasons for Clear Channel - which became a giant only in the last few years, after the Telecommunications Act of 1996 removed many restrictions on media ownership - to curry favor with the governing party.

On one side, Clear Channel is feeling some heat: It is being sued over allegations that it threatens to curtail the airplay of artists who don't tour with its concert division, and there are even some politicians who want to roll back the deregulation that made the company's growth possible. On the other side, the Federal Communications Commission is considering further deregulation that would allow Clear Channel to expand even further, particularly into television.

Or perhaps the quid pro quo is more narrowly focused. Experienced Bushologists let out a collective "Aha!" when Clear Channel was revealed to be behind the pro-war rallies, because the company's top management has a history with George W. Bush. The vice chairman of Clear Channel is Tom Hicks. When Bush was governor of Texas, Hicks was chairman of the University of Texas Investment Management Co., called Utimco, and Clear Channel's chairman, Lowry Mays, was on its board. Under Hicks, Utimco placed much of the university's endowment under the management of companies with strong Republican Party or Bush family ties. In 1998 Hicks purchased the Texas Rangers in a deal that made Bush a multimillionaire.

There's something happening here. What it is ain't exactly clear, but a good guess is that we're now seeing the next stage in the evolution of a new American oligarchy. As Jonathan Chait has written in The New Republic, in the Bush administration "government and business have melded into one big 'us.'" On almost every aspect of domestic policy, business interests rule: "Scores of midlevel appointees now oversee industries for which they once worked." We should have realized that this is a two-way street: If politicians are busy doing favors for businesses that support them, why shouldn't we expect businesses to reciprocate by doing favors for those politicians - by, for example, organizing "grass roots" rallies on their behalf?

What makes it all possible, of course, is the absence of effective watchdogs. In the Clinton years the merest hint of impropriety quickly blew up into a huge scandal; these days, the scandalmongers are more likely to go after journalists who raise questions. Anyway, don't you know there's a war on?

E-mail: krugman@nytimes.com

Copyright 2003 The International Herald Tribune





britney
cnn-early-oribuary
fcc-consolidation
howard-stern
limbaugh
murdoch
superbowl-janet-breast
60 minutes blind sided by clark book viacom ties { April 11 2004 }
American idol delay deployment { January 26 2003 }
Amy goodman giving voice to silenced majority { April 21 2004 }
Aniston bares more [jpg]
Antiwar group says ad is rejected { July 12 2004 }
Ashcroft calls on news to brainwash { June 20 2003 }
Bank australia hbo takeover
Bill oreilly flips out and edits show { June 30 2004 }
British news favors israeli position { June 22 2004 }
Cbs fires producer over arafat special report
Cbs refuses anti bush ad { January 31 2004 }
Clear channel conglomerate { January 30 2003 }
Clear channel deregulation mess
Clear channel hearing
Clear channel mexico san diego { October 4 2002 }
Clear channel organizes pro war rallies { March 26 2003 }
Cnn intimidated by bush
Cnn planted question at debate
Cnn regrets planting debate questions { November 11 2003 }
Cnn vs cnn international different pictures { April 11 2003 }
Comcast makes unsolicited bid for disney
Corporate ads aired as real news
Corruption in the business { September 15 2003 }
Cross ownership { April 20 2001 }
Decline in public trust of media
Defense contractor buys movie theater chain loews { June 22 2004 }
Discovery empire
Disney prevents release of michael moore film { May 5 2004 }
Drawing up press battle lines { February 2 2003 }
Elton john says stars are scared to speak out { July 17 2004 }
Fcc easing television caps save viacom { May 11 2003 }
Fcc questions stations on fake news { August 15 2006 }
Financial times beats new york times as best paper
Fired radio host sues clear channel { July 7 2003 }
Head that could roll at bskyb
Hitler rise to power series canceled { May 15 2003 }
Idol calls in marine
Isaacson resigns cnn
Longer war more money { February 27 2003 }
Mccain feingold stop consolidation
Mccain questions clear channel dixie chicks { July 8 2003 }
Media big fish
Media cross ownership rule { April 29 2003 }
Media empire born { September 2 2003 }
Media giant shows anti kerry film before election
Media is mouthpiece for whatever administration in power { August 12 2004 }
Media mergers { May 14 2002 }
Media owned republicans { September 26 2003 }
Media ownership
Media sells war { February 18 2003 }
Moore reveals carlyle holdings 17 percent disney { July 28 2004 }
Msnbc ceo dismissed { December 21 2002 }
Msnbc future { August 18 2002 }
Msnbc hits bottom
Msnbc savage show canceled { July 7 2003 }
Mtv censors lyrics free mumia
Murdock to control directv { April 10 2003 }
Nbc postpones world dating show
Nbc pres to sony
NBC reports arabs blame US for tsunami { January 7 2005 }
Nbc shakeup
Neil young sings patriot 911 songs
Network executives pressured to support bush { May 28 2008 }
New york times criticizes own war coverage { May 26 2004 }
News ownership chart [gif]
News reporters ordered not to investigate 911
Newspapers cutting foreign correspondents { February 18 2007 }
Npr commercial { April 11 2002 }
Npr gets big money from mcdonalds { November 6 2003 }
Nytimes reporter faces fraud inquiry
Nytimes tensions shakeups
Oreilly attacks son of 911 victim jeremy glick { February 4 2003 }
Pacifica radio moves to berkley { June 24 2003 }
Powell concern media concentration
Powell cut off during interview { May 17 2004 }
Protest music died { February 20 2003 }
Refusal to air iraqi dead criticized { March 19 2003 }
Rep sanders
Rep sanders2
Rick braggs nytimes problem
Salon pacifica { June 20 2002 }
Saudi owned upi massive debt { April 24 1999 }
Sinclair broadcast fires chief for criticizing political ad { October 18 2004 }
Speaker at press corps dinner chides press for doing nothing
Stern tears into fcc { April 18 2003 }
Stories pushed aside in march to war
Ted turned says network news focus is on the pervert of the day
Ted turner lost 85 percent
Ted turner says government protects big media { July 8 2004 }
Thomas friedman calls 911 holy day for war { October 26 2001 }
Time warner joins bidding for MGM { July 2 2004 }
Un newspapers failed to challenge government claim about wmd { March 11 2004 }
Viacom extends mtv reach in china { September 23 2004 }
Viacom president quits { June 2 2004 }
War patriotic music radio { February 24 2003 }
Washington post says iraq coverage was flawed
Washington post to have shorter stories more photos { November 19 2004 }

Files Listed: 97



Correction/submissions

CIA FOIA Archive

National Security
Archives
Support one-state solution for Israel and Palestine Tea Party bumper stickers JFK for Dummies, The Assassination made simple