News and Document archive source
copyrighted material disclaimer at bottom of page

NewsMinenature-healthhealthcancer — Viewing Item


Women double risk for lung cancer { December 2 2003 }

Original Source Link: (May no longer be active)
   http://www.nationalpost.com/home/story.html?id=4D0A075E-EDEB-47C3-B205-A9DEE94BD8C6

http://www.nationalpost.com/home/story.html?id=4D0A075E-EDEB-47C3-B205-A9DEE94BD8C6

Lung cancer risk is double for women
Scientists baffled by shift in disease

Brad Evenson, National Post , with files from Sharon Kirkey, CanWest News Service
National Post; CanWest News Service

Tuesday, December 02, 2003

Female smokers face twice the risk of getting lung cancer as men who smoke, say scientists, although they do not know the reason for the difference.

Research to be presented today at the Radiological Society of North America's annual meeting in Chicago reviews 10 years worth of computed tomography (CT) screening.

"We found that women had twice the risk of developing lung cancer as men, independent of how much they smoked, their age, or the size and textures of nodules found in their lungs," said Claudia Henschke, a professor of radiology at New York Hospital/Cornell Medical Center in New York City.

"There is as of yet no clear consensus why women are at increased risk."

Less surprisingly, the study also found the risk for lung cancer rises with the quantity of tobacco smoked and as a smoker ages.

An estimated 21,000 new cases of lung cancer will be diagnosed in Canada this year, while 19,000 patients will die of the disease. The vast majority of cases -- about 87% -- are caused by direct tobacco use. Second-hand smoke is the chief risk factor among the rest.

According to the Canadian Cancer Society, about 12,200 men and 9,000 women will be diagnosed this year. But the landscape is shifting dramatically. Among women, new lung cancer cases and deaths continue to climb and are now three to four times as high as rates in 1974.

Among men, rates levelled off in the mid-1980s and have fallen consistently, reflecting the drop in tobacco consumption that began in the 1960s. Women did not start cutting back until the 1980s, and so they will not see a drop in cancer rates for a decade.

Verna Mai, director of preventive oncology at Cancer Care Ontario, said it is difficult to assess the U.S. findings because lung cancer is a slow-moving disease. "You tend to see the effects over a period of many years, so you don't see a direct cause and effect."

Dr. Henschke noted that more research is needed to prove women have a higher risk of the disease. "We have to make sure it's not because they are smoking more or started younger" or inhale more, she said.

But "if we find women are more susceptible, we really have to target those young women who are starting to smoke and make a special effort to reach out to them."

One of the hottest debates in lung-cancer research has been whether screening high-risk patients using CT scanners -- a form of X-ray machine -- can detect cancers at an early, treatable stage. Historically, X-ray machines could not detect small tumours with enough efficiency to justify screening millions of people as a preventive health measure. As a result, most lung cancers are not diagnosed until the patient has symptoms, when the disease is incurable.

But CT scanning is now so sophisticated, many doctors believe it should be used to screen high-risk patients.

Another study presented by the same team yesterday found annual CT screening for lung cancer in smokers can detect tumours at their earliest stage, when the cure rate is 80% or better.

Hundreds of private CT screening clinics have popped up across the United States and Canada, some mounted on tractor-trailers and driven from city to city, offering screenings for as little as $300.

"I was worried, so I had a scan," says Rachael Oliver, a Calgary pack-a-day smoker. "It was clean. I didn't expect anything to show up, really. It's worth paying for the peace of mind."

According to a Health Canada survey last year, more men (23%) than women (20%) smoke. But the trend is reversed among teenagers: 23% of girls aged 15 to 19 smoke, compared with 21% of boys in the same age group.

It's not known what may make smoking riskier for women, though some researchers have speculated estrogen, a natural growth hormone, may be partly to blame. Other genetic differences between men and women have also been implicated.

In the U.S. study, researchers examined 2,968 men and women age 40 and older who had smoked or still smoked cigarettes but had no cancer symptoms.

The goal was to determine which risk factors -- including age, gender and smoking history -- when combined with the shape and size of lung nodules found on CT scans, determined the chances of getting lung cancer. The study was part of a larger effort to evaluate the usefulness of annual CT screenings in people at high risk.

The researchers detected 77 lung cancers in the 2,968 men and women screened. They also found lung nodules, which can be a precursor to cancer, in 1,097 of the participants, who were all at high risk for lung cancer.

"We also found that the more you smoke -- and as you age -- the greater the chances of developing lung cancer," said Dr. Henschke, the study's lead author.

But without further research, Dr. Mai said it would be a decade before CT screening becomes a common public health measure.

SEEKING STUDY PARTICIPANTS:

Smokers and former smokers in the Toronto area are being sought by Princess Margaret Hospital for a study headed by Dr. Heidi Roberts, which is examining the use of low-dose CT screening to detect lung cancers at a stage when they are still curable. Interested volunteers over the age of 55 who smoke, or have smoked, one pack a day for at least 10 years, or half-a-pack a day for 20 years should contact Dr. Roberts at 416 946-4501, ext. 6318 for further details. Information on the international study can be found on the Internet at:www.ielcap.org

Ran with fact box "Seeking Study Participants" which had been appended to the story.; bevenson@nationalpost.com

Copyright 2003 National Post


starches
1mil new skin cancer { May 27 2003 }
20 cancer fighting foods to eat all summer
African american women higher breast cancer { December 7 2003 }
All types of alcohol raise cancer risk
Antibiotic use causes cancer
Asians get cancer when in america
Asians low cancer rate
Beta carotene supplements
Blacks more likely die cancer
Breast cancer link to use of antibiotics
Breast cancer risk reduced by exercise
Broccoli helps prevent cancer { April 20 2005 }
California sues mcdonalds and potato chips over cancer
Cancer broccoli { May 28 2002 }
Cancer causing drug found in british poultry { October 21 2004 }
Cancer causing pesticides living in our bodies { June 21 2005 }
Cancer deaths decline first time since 1930 { February 9 2006 }
Cancer french fries { July 3 2002 }
Car exhausts may cause child cancer
Carbohydrates could be linked to breast cancer { August 9 2004 }
Carcinogen sealed glass jar foods
Carrots help cut cancer risk
Curry fights cancer
Curry fights prostate cancer study says { January 17 2006 }
Curry shuts down melanoma cancer tumors
Diet alcohol linked to one third cancer cases { May 20 2004 }
Diet and tobacco account for most cancer
Diet responsible for half cancers says fox files [wav]
Doctor in africa discovers western diet is cancerous { February 28 1911 }
Eating red meat increases risk of colon cancer
Eu beef cancer { May 4 1999 }
Fatty diet linked to cancer { March 21 2007 }
Garlic wards off cancer
Good night sleep fights cancer
Green tea cuts risk of cancer
Green tea reduces risk prostate cancer
Hair dyes linked to kind of cancer { January 24 2004 }
High fat diet increases breast cancer risk
High fat linked breast cancer { July 18 2003 }
High fiber reduces colon cancer { May 2 2003 }
High sugar diet linked to cancer { March 21 2007 }
Hormones in milk are linked to cancer
Meat and alcohol cause breast cancer
Meats and sweets boost cancer risk { July 10 2007 }
Microwaving plastic causes cancer in foods
Milk cause of cancer
Miso soup cuts breast cancer { June 18 2003 }
More causes cancer
Natural solutions for estrogen
New study says sun screen ineffective { June 15 2006 }
Nonfat milk linked to prostate cancer
Obesity linked to cancer { January 9 2006 }
One third cancer caused by diet
Pill linked to cancer { April 3 2003 }
Processed meats raise risk of cancer
Prostate testing debate
Red meat cancer { April 30 1996 }
Red meat diets cause cancer { April 7 2004 }
Red meat fuels bowel cancer risk { June 15 2005 }
Redheads risk of skin cancer without burns { August 29 2005 }
Regular aspirin use linked to cancer cases { January 9 2004 }
Study links breast cancer to antibiotic use { February 16 2004 }
Sun exposure may aid skin cancer victims { February 2 2005 }
Sunlight vit d prevents breast colon lung prostate cancer
Sunscreen blamed skin cancer
Sunscreens fails to prevent free radicals
Sunshine helps fight against breast cancer { August 4 2007 }
Sunshine may protect prostate from cancer { June 15 2005 }
Tea may fight ovarian cancer
Toxin in pet food eaten by chickens fed to people { May 4 2007 }
Toxins in the kitchen { May 4 2007 }
Vegetables and soy combats cancer
Vegetarian diet helps man fight cancer { June 7 2007 }
Vitamins tied to prostate cancer
Western asians higher cancer than eastern { June 1 2001 }
White wine increase risk of cancer
Women double risk for lung cancer { December 2 2003 }
Women plagued by lung cancer

Files Listed: 78



Correction/submissions

CIA FOIA Archive

National Security
Archives
Support one-state solution for Israel and Palestine Tea Party bumper stickers JFK for Dummies, The Assassination made simple