|  | Anthrax expert
 Original Source Link:  (May no longer be active)http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2002/02/08/anthrax/index_np.html
 | http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2002/02/08/anthrax/index_np.html
 
 Is a U.S. bioweapons scientist behind last fall's anthrax
 attacks?
 A growing number of scientific experts have come to this conclusion. But the FBI seems
 strangely reluctant to zero in on the most likely suspects.
 
 - - - - - - - - - - - -
 By Laura Rozen
 
 Feb. 8, 2002 | WASHINGTON -- When Arthur O. Anderson, chief of clinical pathology at the
 U.S. Army Medical Research Institute for Infectious Diseases (USAMRIID), saw the
 anthrax sent to Sen. Tom Daschle, D-S.D., last October, he was amazed.
 
 "There was nothing there except spores," he told Salon. "Normally, if you take a crude
 preparation of anthrax spores, you see parts of degenerated bacteria. But this stuff was
 highly refined."
 
 Another former Army lab scientist characterized the sample as "very, very good."
 
 "Only a very small group of people could have made this," said David Franz, a former U.N.
 weapons inspector in Iraq and biodefense scientist at USAMRIID, who now works for the
 Southern Research Institute, a defense contractor. "If you look at the sample from the
 standpoint of biology, it tells me this person [who made the anthrax] was very good at what
 they do. And this wasn't the first batch they've made. They've done this for years. The
 concentration was a trillion spores [on anthrax] per gram. That's incredibly concentrated."
 
 Anderson and Franz aren't drawing conclusions about where the anthrax came from --
 perhaps in part because the subject is deeply sensitive at the U.S. Army's own biodefense
 lab, which could find itself at the center of the investigation. But conversations with dozens
 of scientists and experienced biodefense hands reveal a growing belief that last fall's anthrax
 letter culprit is most likely an experienced bioweapons scientist. And while Franz and others
 note that there are Iraqi and Russian scientists with the skills to pull off the complex
 anthrax-mail attack, many experts now believe the culprit worked at a U.S. bioweapons
 facility.
 
 Only a few dozen individuals in the U.S. possess the expertise to produce the sophisticated
 anthrax specimen sent to Daschle, Vermont Sen. Patrick Leahy and at least three media
 outlets last fall. There may be as many as 200 Russian scientists capable of such work, and
 perhaps 10 Iraqis. But certain clues have convinced many -- though not all -- bioweapons
 experts who've followed the FBI investigation closely that the anthrax in the letters most
 likely came from a U.S. lab. That's chiefly because Ames strain anthrax, the type used in the
 letters, has been distributed by USAMRIID to about 20 U.S labs since 1981. Of those,
 only four facilities are believed to have the ability to produce the highly lethal, dry powder
 form of the Ames strain anthrax the lethal letters contained.
 
 But despite signs that this should narrow the list of anthrax suspects to a few dozen people,
 the FBI appears to be casting a wider net in its investigation, which seems to have made
 fairly limited progress since the first victim, American Media Inc. photo editor Bob Stevens,
 died of anthrax inhalation four months ago.
 - - - - - - - - - - - -
 
 
 
 | 
 |