NewsMine — deceptions — eastern-blackout — Viewing Item

Excuse for more deregulation { September 3 2003 } Original Source Link: (May no longer be active)    (202) 347-0020 * http://www.accuracy.org * ipa@accuracy.org Institute for Public Accuracy 915 National Press Building, Washington, D.C. 20045 (202) 347-0020 * http://www.accuracy.org * ipa@accuracy.org ___________________________________________________ Wednesday, September 3, 2003 Interviews Available Electricity and Deregulation: More Corporate Scams? WENONAH HAUTER, whauter@citizen.org, http://www.citizen.org/cmep TYSON SLOCUM, tslocum@citizen.org Hauter is director of Public Citizen's Critical Mass Energy and Environment Program; Slocum is research director for the group. Hauter said today: "The House blackout hearings today and tomorrow will be nothing more than a high-wire act promoting transmission policies benefitting Enron-esque power marketers at the expense of consumers. That's because the House proposes sticking consumers with a $100 billion tab for the construction of new transmission lines that big energy companies want but consumers don't need. Instead of pandering to an electric industry that gave more than $40 million to Congress since 1999 (more than two-thirds to the GOP), the focus of the hearings should be on protecting consumers by re-evaluating the wisdom of deregulation. After all, deregulation is the main factor behind the blackouts. First, America's transmission system was designed to accommodate local electricity markets, not the large, freewheeling trading of electricity and movement of power over long distances under deregulation. Sending power over a much wider area strains a transmission system designed to serve local utilities. Second, deregulation means utilities are no longer required to reinvest their profits back into the transmission system. That's why re-investment in wires has fallen by hundreds of millions of dollars since deregulation: energy companies simply aren't willing to invest their money where there's no chance of making runaway profits. To make matters worse, President Bush and Tom DeLay want to eliminate the ability of citizens to have any input on the construction of new transmission lines." ENVER MASUD, enver@his.com, http://www.twf.org/bio/em.html Masud managed the U.S. National Power Grid Study in 1980 and the National Electric Reliability Study for the U.S. Department of Energy. Since 1987 he has consulted internationally in the electric power sector. He set up and directed the Operations Review Division at the Iowa Commerce Commission which, among other things, persuaded Iowa utilities to better coordinate operations for savings of $50 million annually. He said today: "President Bush claims that the blackout was due to 'antiquated transmission' -- a result of not having a fully competitive market. Not true -- the blackout was a failure of system protection schemes. The 'antiquated transmission' is yet another outcome of failed utility restructuring and the promotion of 'competition' which provided independent power producers an opportunity for greater profits than under traditional utility regulation." HARVEY WASSERMAN, nonukeshw@aol.com Wasserman, who lives in Ohio, is author of "The Last Energy War: The Battle Over Utility Deregulation." He said today: "The barons of electric power, like FirstEnergy, based here in Ohio, claimed deregulation would bring lower prices and increased reliability, but the opposite is twice true. With no one minding the store, FirstEnergy has operated the Davis-Besse nuclear plant with a hole in its head, has spent $400 million to bring it on line without ever consulting the public, and has set off the unprecedented blackout of 50 million people, all while raising rates and swallowing other utilities. When it was deregulated by the Ohio legislature ... FirstEnergy took nearly $9 billion in 'stranded cost' subsidies from the ratepayers, allegedly to help bring about competition. Because FirstEnergy and its president, Anthony Alexander, have raised huge amounts of money for George W. Bush, they are above the law, and will not be prosecuted..." For more information, contact at the Institute for Public Accuracy: Sam Husseini, (202) 347-0020; or David Zupan, (541) 484-9167

15 minute outage college park { August 14 2003 } 50 million affected Air traffic control 30 second power failure { August 17 2003 } Alqaida claims responsibility for blackout { August 18 2003 } Blackout affecting parts metro detroit { August 14 2003 } Bush says not terrorism { August 15 2003 } Canada blames lightning Cia possibility terrorist tempering Consumers to pay 50m to update grid { August 17 2003 } Deregulation makes electric grid complex web Excuse for more deregulation { September 3 2003 } Fire destabalized grid { August 15 2003 } Fire edison plant manhattan { August 14 2003 } Fire florida substation Fire in pennsylvania nuclear plant Fire manhattan generator { August 14 2003 } Firstenergy assigned blackout blame Homeland security passed blackout test { August 19 2003 } Homeland security teams alerted Homeland security teams ready with blackout Huge power blackouts ny detroit { August 14 2003 } Human error cause of blackout { August 27 2003 } Italy has blackout Lodon outage lack of funding London loses power Major power outage Maryland schools open power back { August 29 2003 } Northeast blackout fire coned transformer Ny power outages not terrorism { August 14 2003 } Officials blame ohio Power2 [jpg] Simultaneaous faults caused england power out { August 29 2003 } System crash was predicted { August 15 2003 } Taskforce points the finger over blackout { November 19 2003 } Terror not ruled out Thats why no electricity in baghdad Traffic agent wrote tickets { August 20 2003 } Uk firm cleared in blackout Unconfirmed reports major fire { August 14 2003 } University maryland power outage Us canada argue over cause Utility deregulation possible villain { August 16 2003 } Files Listed: 42

Correction/submissions

CIA FOIA Archive

National Security Archives

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information, go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purpose of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.