News and Document archive source
copyrighted material disclaimer at bottom of page

NewsMinecabal-elitew-administrationbig-money — Viewing Item


Bill making bankruptcy difficulty passes { April 15 2005 }

Original Source Link: (May no longer be active)
   http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A53688-2005Apr14.html

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A53688-2005Apr14.html

Bankruptcy Bill Passes; Bush Expected to Sign
For Many, Erasing Debt Would Be Harder
By Kathleen Day
Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, April 15, 2005; Page E01


The House gave final passage yesterday to legislation intended to make it harder for consumers to wipe out debt through bankruptcy, clearing the way for President Bush to sign the bill into law as he has promised to do.

Lawmakers voted 302 to 126 for the bill, which is identical to a measure the Senate passed last month. It would make the most significant changes to bankruptcy law since 1978. Its passage by Congress is a victory for executives in the credit card, retail and auto financing industries who have pushed it for nearly a decade. They argue that the changes are necessary to weed out abusers of the system who use Chapter 7 bankruptcy protection to shirk debt they can afford to pay.

"This bill will help restore responsibility and integrity to the bankruptcy system by cracking down on fraudulent, abusive, and opportunistic bankruptcy claims," said House Judiciary Committee Chairman F. James Sensenbrenner Jr. (R-Wis.).

Sen. Charles E. Grassley (R-Iowa), the chief sponsor of the bill, said the bill would preserve two key principles: Those able to pay some of their debts would have to do so, and those who need a fresh start would still be able to extinguish their debt through bankruptcy.

Consumer advocacy groups and many Democrats, who fought the legislation, disagree, arguing that lenders' liberal credit policies and aggressive sales practices have been equally responsible for putting many Americans over their heads in debt. They say the new legislation would be too harsh on individuals driven into debt by job loss, sickness, divorce or military duty. That is especially unfair, they say, because the bill would preserve loopholes that enable wealthy individuals who file for bankruptcy to shield unlimited amounts of money in complex trusts and in multimillion-dollar homes in states including Texas and Florida.

"The big winner under the new law will be credit card issuers, whose reckless and abusive lending practices have driven many Americans to the brink of bankruptcy," said Travis B. Plunkett, lobbyist for the nonprofit Consumer Federation of America. "Now that Americans in bankruptcy will have to pay more back to creditors, they have a right to expect that credit card companies will lower their interest rates and fees. We will be watching credit card companies closely to see if they will become more responsible corporate citizens in return for this unprecedented gift from Congress."

Sensenbrenner, Grassley and other proponents estimate that about 100,000 debtors of the 1 million a year who now file Chapter 7 bankruptcy could repay more than the current system requires. Opponents say the number is closer to 30,000 but that, in any case, the new legislation does little to weed out abuse. Instead, they say, it adds red tape to the process and makes it more expensive by requiring debtors to seek counseling before filing for bankruptcy.

The legislation will become law six months after Bush signs it, which he must do within 10 days or it becomes law automatically.

The central feature of the new bill is that it would take away much of the discretion bankruptcy judges have in deciding who is eligible to wipe out substantial portions of debt by filing under Chapter 7 and who should be forced into filing for Chapter 13 bankruptcy, which requires some repayment of obligations over several years. Instead it would require judges to calculate eligibility by applying a formula, based on income and expenses, to would-be filers whose annual income is above the median in the region in which they live. Those who are required to file under Chapter 13 would have to make repayment for five years. Under current law, those payments cease after three years, even if the debt is not fully repaid.

It also would make consumers who file for bankruptcy wait two to four years longer before they can file again.

The credit card industry defeated a provision that would have required credit card issuers to tell customers how much more interest they would be charged if they chose to pay only the required minimum each month. But the bill would require companies, upon request, to tell customers how long it will take to pay off a debt by remitting minimum amounts. And the bill retains a provision business groups had tried to kill that would give bankruptcy courts more authority to limit the amount of money executives and other corporate insiders can take in bonuses and severance pay from companies filing for bankruptcy protection.

Both sides have waged a polarized war of words for years, with neither side conceding that the bill might not prove as beneficial as proponents say or as onerous as critics contend. Privately, however, some lobbyists for the bill say it has been so watered down from what industry initially proposed years ago that its passage is not a complete triumph for business. The lobbyists spoke only on the condition that they not be named because of concerns about damaging relations with their clients.

Some of these lobbyists say it is possible that the bill may make it easier for individuals to cheat the system: Imposing eligibility tests for bankruptcy that are less flexible than those under current law would provide individuals who want to manipulate the system a road map of what they need to do. They say it would tell manipulators what, when and under what terms they can buy and keep items during bankruptcy -- whether it is new cars or fancy stereos.

Lobbyists and others who tracked the bill say the biggest winner under the new law would not be the credit card industry but rather automobile manufacturers, which often provide financing for the cars they sell. The new legislation would put car companies ahead of most other creditors in line for payment.

But others focused on the broader changes that the bill would create. "The essential philosophical and political divide over the bankruptcy bill boils down to whether you see filing for bankruptcy as a right or a privilege," said John D. McMickle, a lawyer who was formerly the bankruptcy lawyer for the Senate Judiciary Committee. "The new law makes bankruptcy a privilege reserved only for people who can prove they can't repay their debts."

The bill has been passed several times by both the Senate and House in the past three sessions of Congress but never made it into law. In one case, President Bill Clinton vetoed it as unfair to consumers. Despite setbacks, the industry continued to lobby hard for the bill. The banking, credit card and retail industries gave more than $56 million to political parties and candidates in the 2004 elections, most of it going to Republicans, according to the Center for Responsive Politics, a nonpartisan, nonprofit research group that tracks political contributions.

Yesterday, lawmakers, including Grassley, said they thought the long fight was worth it. "This demonstrates that when you're right, you'll win out," he said.

Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist (R-Tenn.) said the "style, tone" and speed with which the Republican-controlled Congress passed the bankruptcy legislation will be a hallmark of legislation in the months ahead.



2005 The Washington Post Company


drug-bill
energy-bill
mines
social-security
2006 cuts in domestic spending across the board { May 27 2004 }
42 senators millionaires
Abramoff tied to white house photographed with bush
Advocates of war now profit from iraq reconstruction { July 14 2004 }
Bankruptcy law tough on katrina victims { September 8 2005 }
Bill making bankruptcy difficulty passes { April 15 2005 }
Bush aids finances detailed { June 16 2003 }
Bush appoints telecom lobbyist to fcc { February 4 2006 }
Bush budget cost more billions
Bush campaign raises 84m { October 14 2003 }
Bush charges 9m for african president meeting { November 10 2005 }
Bush enron ties in spotlight
Bush protects pharmaceutical and insurance from lawyers
Bush raises millions california { June 28 2003 }
Bush rejects tax on oil windfall profits { March 2006 }
Bush replaces government jobs with private contracts { April 18 2005 }
Bush signs law curbing class action lawsuits
Bush signs transportation bill full of pork { August 11 2005 }
Bush slashes domestic programs boosts defense
Bush turns to big military contractors for border control { May 18 2006 }
Bush wants to protect telecomm companies { February 12 2008 }
Chinese mega bucks for bush brothers { December 16 2003 }
Corporate power is US driving force { July 15 2004 }
Delays corporate gop fundraising investigated { July 12 2004 }
Donors stay in the lincoln bedroom
Energy bill exploits katrina to pay off oil industry { October 5 2005 }
Enron money helped GOP redistribution effort { July 12 2004 }
Financial firms are bushs biggest donors { January 9 2004 }
Fundraiser denies link between money access { May 17 2004 }
Goldman sachs workers big donations to bush { August 20 2004 }
GOP K street lobbyists access
Gop lobbyists invisible powerful world
Gop reaping in lobbyists { June 26 2003 }
Gop to renew tax cut for wealthy { May 10 2006 }
Gop uses katrina to ease energy laws { September 28 2005 }
Halliburton secret nobid iraq work contracts { June 16 2004 }
Healthcare overhaul is quietly underway { January 31 2005 }
House energy bill will foul air
Ken lay blames friendship with bush
Lobbyist appointed leader gop { June 17 2003 }
Lobbyist defends 800k contingency fee { January 4 2004 }
Lobbyists hire lawmakers kid { June 22 2003 }
Lobbyists kids not alright { June 24 2003 }
Lobbyists senators sons { June 23 2003 }
Mccain wants local business rebuilding instead of halliburton
More area money goes to bush
Oil lobbyist watered down climate research { June 9 2005 }
Power elite george w
Record deficit rein in domestic costs { January 4 2004 }
Refinery bill guts clean air pollution standards
Republicans are the big spenders { August 4 2005 }
Republicans backed by big business block labor bill { June 26 2007 }
Republicans conflicting loyalities to oil industry { May 4 2006 }
Rumsfeld sold ownership in pentagon contractors
Security aids switch to lobbying { April 29 2003 }
Senate approves 447b defense budget
Senate passes large corporate tax legislation { October 11 2004 }
Senate refuses to close wealthy loophole on bankruptcy
Senators financial holdings revealed { June 14 2003 }
Spending surges to historic level
Thanksgiving brings feeding frenzy round pork barrel { November 26 2003 }
The gop machine made bush supreme
Top campaign donors trade with iran iraq
Two bills benefit top bush fundraisers { November 22 2003 }
Wall street bush biggest donor { October 23 2003 }
Washington insiders consults contracts { September 30 2003 }
Wealthier vote back bush

Files Listed: 67



Correction/submissions

CIA FOIA Archive

National Security
Archives
Support one-state solution for Israel and Palestine Tea Party bumper stickers JFK for Dummies, The Assassination made simple