News and Document archive source
copyrighted material disclaimer at bottom of page
NewsMine cabal-elite european-union trade Viewing Item | Washington warns against corporate fortress europe { November 24 2003 } Original Source Link: (May no longer be active) http://news.ft.com/servlet/ContentServer?pagename=FT.com/StoryFT/FullStory&c=StoryFT&cid=1069493427167&p=1012571727088http://news.ft.com/servlet/ContentServer?pagename=FT.com/StoryFT/FullStory&c=StoryFT&cid=1069493427167&p=1012571727088
EU takeover directive threatens new trade rift By Daniel Dombey in Brussels Published: November 24 2003 9:06 | Last Updated: November 24 2003 9:06 Fresh strains are threatening relations between the US and European Union after a warning from Washington against a "fortress Europe" in which it would be harder for US companies to carry out takeovers.
US concerns have been raised by a new compromise version of the EU's takeover directive, which was originally intended to make takeovers easier in Europe but has been changed extensively because of Germany's objections.
This comes on top of conflicts between the EU and the US over government subsidies for the US steel industry.
The US has made its objections about the takeover directive known to all 15 EU governments, stepping up contacts as the likelihood has increased that the compromise will be approved.
The current version - expected to receive the backing of most EU governments this week - would make it much more difficult for US companies to pursue hostile bids in Europe. The US warns that such a law could send a signal that "Europe is not open for business".
Eight EU governments have indicated they will back the directive at a ministers' meeting on Thursday. It has also gathered wide support in the European parliament.
The deal waters down earlier versions that would have banned EU companies warding off takeovers through multiple voting shares and "poison pills" without shareholder backing.
Instead, the compromise directive makes the ban on poison pill defences optional. It would allow EU members' governments to relax bans on such defences where the bidding company came from a jurisdiction that permitted poison pills , such as the US.
Financial market participants are concernedthat the proposal could damage Europe's access to capital. Such groups argue that legal scrutiny and shareholder activism in the US mean that US-style poison pills serve to increase the bidding price for takeovers. They say US companies with poison pills are just as likely to be taken over than those without.
Until now Frits Bolkestein, the EU's single market Commissioner, has refused to back the measure, and member states would only be able to override him through unanimity. "This [compromise] proposal would take the heart out of the directive," said Mr Bolkestein's spokesman. "It could tempt some member states to allow barriers to takeovers that do not currently exist." But the Commission, which has tried to push versions of the directive through since 1989, is itself bitterly divided over Mr Bolkestein's stance. The pressure on him to support the directive would mount if both parliament and most member states approved the compromise.
The US said the rules could create difficulties with World Trade Organisation provisions and other international guidelines.
|
| Files Listed: 21 |
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been
specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material
available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political,
human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc.
We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as
provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with
Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without
profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included
information for research and educational purposes. For more information,
go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use
copyrighted material from this site for purpose of your own that go beyond
'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
|