NewsMine — cabal-elite — corporate — telecoms — Viewing Item

Verizon sued for giving nsa phone records { May 12 2006 } Original Source Link: (May no longer be active)    http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/business/1310AP_NSA_Records_Verizon.html?source=mypi http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/business/1310AP_NSA_Records_Verizon.html?source=mypi Friday, May 12, 2006 · Last updated 2:48 p.m. PT Verizon sued for giving NSA phone records By BETH DEFALCO ASSOCIATED PRESS WRITER TRENTON, N.J. -- Two New Jersey public interest lawyers sued Verizon Communications Inc. for $5 billion Friday, claiming the phone carrier violated privacy laws by turning over phone records to the National Security Agency for a secret government surveillance program. Attorneys Bruce Afran and Carl Mayer filed the lawsuit Friday afternoon in federal district court in Manhattan, where Verizon is headquartered. The lawsuit asks the court to stop Verizon from turning over any more records to the NSA without a warrant or consent of the subscriber. "This is the largest and most vast intrusion of civil liberties we've ever seen in the United States," Afran said of the NSA program. USA Today reported on Thursday that the NSA has been building a database of millions of Americans' everyday telephone calls since shortly after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks. Verizon, along with AT&T Corp. and BellSouth Corp., complied, the newspaper reported. The lawsuit claims that by turning over the records to the government, Verizon violated the Telecommunications Act and the Constitution. "No warrants have been issued for the disclosure of such information, no suspicion of terrorist activity or other criminal activity has been alleged against the subscribers," the lawsuit said. Verizon, the country's largest telecommunications company by revenue, said in a statement that the company had not yet seen the lawsuit and, because of that, believed it was premature to comment. The lawsuit seeks $1,000 for each violation of the Telecommunications Act, or $5 billion if the case is certified as class-action. Afran and Mayer have filed numerous lawsuits against New Jersey officials over such things as political appointments and finances. Afran said that he and Mayer will also ask for documents dealing with the origination of the program and President Bush's role in the program. Verizon said that because the NSA program is highly classified, it wouldn't confirm or deny whether the company participated. However, the company did suggest it limited access to customer records. "Verizon does not, and will not, provide any government agency unfettered access to our customer records or provide information to the government under circumstances that would allow a fishing expedition," the company said.

AOL internet-neutrality worldcom Att wants to filter internet traffic Bush wants att eavesdropping charges dropped { May 14 2006 } Comcast terminates employees for unionizing { March 19 2004 } Corporations battle over internet control { May 18 2006 } Global crossing { August 10 2002 } House senate fight over internet discrimination { May 20 2006 } New cable bill undermines local leverage { April 27 2006 } Qwest only telephone company to defy fed { May 12 2006 } Sbc att merged expected to cut 13 thousand jobs { February 2 2005 } Telecom giants gave fed phone records { May 12 2006 } Telecoms give records to law enforcement Telecoms to block non preferencial sites { April 27 2006 } Verizon closes deal to buy MCI at 7b { February 14 2005 } Verizon fights against internet neutrality { May 8 2006 } Verizon sued for giving nsa phone records { May 12 2006 } Verizon upset over fcc airwaves giveaway { July 9 2004 } Yahoo helps china jail activists Files Listed: 17

Correction/submissions

CIA FOIA Archive

National Security Archives

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information, go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purpose of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.