News and Document archive source
copyrighted material disclaimer at bottom of page

NewsMinecabal-elitecorporatepolitical-finance — Viewing Item


Companies make employees donate political campaigns { September 3 2004 }

Original Source Link: (May no longer be active)
   http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/news/archive/2004/09/03/financial0927EDT0025.DTL

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/news/archive/2004/09/03/financial0927EDT0025.DTL

In new law's wake, companies slash political donations
- JEANNE CUMMINGS, The Wall Street Journal
Friday, September 3, 2004


(09-03) 06:27 PDT (AP) --

For years, Republicans and Democrats solicited donations from casino giant MGM Mirage. Usually, Chairman J. Terrence Lanni coughed up at least $1 million of the company's money to secure access to lawmakers who were also getting money from MGM's competitors.

Last year, new campaign-finance laws barred these kinds of unlimited contributions to party coffers. Instead, independent but partisan groups nicknamed 527s -- for the section of the tax code under which they fall -- rushed to fill the void, scooping up cash the parties couldn't take.

A representative from one such Republican-leaning group telephoned Mr. Lanni a few months ago. Mr. Lanni doesn't remember which one but does recall "it took me about three nanoseconds" to say no. Mr. Lanni says Las Vegas-based MGM isn't giving a penny to 527s, which he says violate the spirit of campaign-finance laws.

Some of the nation's most prolific corporate donors have seized on the restrictions of campaign-finance laws to largely drop out of the political money race. Verizon Communications Inc., International Paper Co., and other companies that in the 1990s poured unprecedented amounts of cash into the political system have sharply cut donations. Of the top 10 corporate political donors in 2000, which contributed more than $21 million in total to both parties, not one is giving to the 527s.

"It was an opportunity to draw a line in the sand and say no," said Kristin Krouse, a spokeswoman for FedEx Corp.

The collapse of corporate funding marks a major shift in the history of political finance. Labor unions haven't hesitated to transfer funds formerly earmarked for unregulated or "soft money" donations to the new groups. By contrast, corporations have been disinclined to fund 527s. The shift has left Republicans, by far the major beneficiary of their money, at a financial disadvantage for the short term at least.

Instead, companies are seeking a more direct role in the electoral process. Rather than simply writing checks, they're encouraging employees to lobby Congress on particular issues or support individual candidates. Companies are reviving old-fashioned but smaller political fund-raising operations that solicit donations from employees. And in a tight race where voter turnout could play a critical role, corporations have gone from being campaign underwriters to get-out-the-vote machines. Dow Chemical Corp. is even reaching out to its 37,000 retirees for extra lobbying clout on pet issues.

This could have the unintended effect of drawing companies closer into the political fray, even as they pare back their financial commitments. Companies, having narrowly focused their political ambitions, might find themselves with more clout about specific policies than they ever did doling out cash to the national parties. That's particularly true of companies' efforts to boost turnout.

"I haven't seen a previous election cycle when businesses did this in a concentrated way," says Matthew Dowd, a political adviser to President Bush.

Take the case of Stamford, Conn.-based International Paper, which previously handed over $500,000 in total to the two main parties at election time. Now employees can use special software to track political issues. This year, 2,500 workers sent e-mails to the Senate encouraging postal reform. Many of International Paper's customers suffer when postal rates rise.

Before a Republican Senate primary in South Carolina earlier this year, John Runyan, who oversees International Paper's fund-raising, sought out 300 politically active employees in that state and sent e-mails urging them to vote for South Carolina Rep. Jim DeMint. The pro-free-trade stance of Mr. DeMint was supported by International Paper, a company that depends on exports. Mr. DeMint's chief Republican challenger, backed by textile giants, was advocating a more protectionist agenda.

After squeaking into a runoff race, Mr. DeMint won the nomination. Mr. DeMint says he was unaware of the forestry-products company's support but notes it was more useful to him than a check written to a national committee. "I'd much rather have the voters," he says. International Paper isn't giving any money to 527 groups.

The link between corporate money and politics became firmly established in the early 1990s when politicians turned the business of extracting money from companies into an art form. Democrats rewarded corporate contributors with overnight stays in the Clinton White House. Republicans matched that with exclusive briefings and getaways with their leaders in Congress. Previously, campaign-finance rules and memories of the Watergate scandals had prompted companies to shy away from actively funding political parties.

During that time, contributions to parties were unlimited, while donations to individual candidates were -- and still are -- capped at specific levels.

In 2002, businesses pumped $215 million into the political process, or about 42 percent of the $507 million given to party committees in unregulated donations. More than 70 percent of that went to Republican committees, according to Political Money Line, a nonpartisan watchdog that tracks political financing.

Companies long disliked handing over shareholders' cash because it looked as if the money disappeared into a black hole with little accountability. But many felt they couldn't abandon the practice as long as their competitors kept on donating. The McCain-Feingold campaign-finance law barred those unregulated donations.

But with the rise of the 527 groups, which were exempt from the law's strictures, companies realized they would have even less control. "You give your money over to some entity that is loosely affiliated with a particular political purpose and loosely regulated," complains David French, senior vice president for government relations at the International Food Services Distributors Association.

Company executives still personally contribute to candidates and companies are increasing fund raising directly from their employees. At least 29 companies donated money to both parties' convention committees, up from nine in 2000, one of the last remaining opportunities to hand over unlimited funds. In addition, during this week's Republican convention in New York, they're buying access to lawmakers by hosting lavish parties in their honor. But all that combined will likely total only about 10 percent of what had previously been given in unregulated donations, according to public financial disclosure reports.

By and large, corporate money "is probably gone. I don't think we're going to change their minds," says Charlie Black, a longtime Republican activist and informal adviser to the Bush-Cheney re-election campaign.

Thomas J. Tauke, a Verizon executive vice president and former Republican congressman from Iowa, received dozens of calls from activist groups hoping to grab some of the $1.6 million in unregulated donations Verizon gave to party committees in 2002. Uneasy with the unstable legal environment surrounding the groups, Mr. Tauke said no and won support from the phone company's board for his decision.

He had little fear of a backlash from lawmakers, who aren't allowed to coordinate with the 527 groups. Besides, he noted, there is safety in numbers: "The vast majority of corporations are not making contributions," he says.

Instead, campaign-finance laws are "forcing corporations to get more creative as far as how they are going to be political," says Jeff Pannozzo, the political-advocacy-program manager at DuPont Co. "Before, they could write a check and that was their participation."

A survey after the 2000 election by the Business Industrial Political Action Committee, a nonpartisan business advocacy group known as BIPAC, found that employees ranked their employers as the most credible source of information about public policy affecting their jobs. Yet only 7 percent of those surveyed heard from their companies about those subjects in the 2000 elections while 17 percent heard from union representatives.

One remedy has been to revive companies' political action committees, or PACs, groups that solicit contributions from employees. Up to $5,000 can be given to a candidate each election. PACs have been around since the 1970s but were superseded by the rise of unregulated donations in the 1990s. Companies are rediscovering that they're an easy way to get credit for helping a specific candidate. PACs also help identify employees who want to volunteer to support certain political causes. Companies aren't allowed to coerce employees into donating to their PAC, or punish those who decline.

There are now 201 corporate PACs, according to Political Money Line, an increase of more than 30 percent over the past four years. The amount of money collected by corporate PACs in 2003 totaled $111 million, nearly $20 million more than was reported in the entire 2001-2002 political cycle. That doesn't include money raised in 2004, which hasn't yet been tallied.

Fannie Mae, a government-sponsored home-mortgage financier, was counted among the titans of political largesse, giving more than $1.8 million in unregulated donations in 2002. Once the campaign-finance law passed, Fannie Mae decided to focus on its PAC instead of giving the money to 527 groups. The company quickly discovered that its PAC accounts were empty. Employees hadn't been asked to donate for more than a decade.

Fannie Mae's top brass sent out a call for contributions in January. Since then, 600 employees have contributed nearly $600,000. Rather than mailing off a few big checks to party committees, Fannie Mae deposited 40 smaller checks into the campaign coffers of every member -- Democrat and Republican -- of the House Financial Services Committee, the panel that oversees the heart of the mortgage giant's business. Total spent in donations to that one committee: $67,000.

"There was a new environment we were in that pointed to PACs as the way to go," says Brian Faith, a Fannie Mae spokesman.

Most companies shy away from being explicit in their messages to employees. Jay Allen, Wal-Mart Stores Inc.'s senior vice president for media affairs, says the company's voter-turnout program is nonpartisan. "About half (of employees) are Democrats and half are Republicans, just like the rest of the country. We don't want to offend anybody," he says.

But in communications with PAC contributors or executives in the main office, Wal-Mart feels free to be more explicit in pushing specific candidates or issues. Recently, Sen. Blanche Lincoln, an Arkansas Democrat who is up for re-election, chatted with Wal-Mart managers at a regular Saturday meeting at the company's Bentonville, Ark., headquarters. "We emphasized what a good friend she's been to Wal-Mart," says Mr. Allen.

The big health insurer Cigna Corp. mobilizes its 30,000-strong work force to push for specific health-care reforms. This year, Kristin Julason, vice president of federal affairs, e-mailed workers urging them to lobby their senators to pass the 2004 Class Action Fairness Act, which aimed to limit jury awards in such suits. She included a copy of the legislation, a simply written summary and proposed wording for the messages. About 7,000 Cigna workers sent Capitol Hill pleas to pass the bill, which ultimately failed.

With most analysts predicting another presidential-election squeaker, companies' get-out-the-vote efforts are assuming even greater importance. In Ohio, a critical state for the Bush campaign, BIPAC, the business advocacy group, has set a goal for local businesses to encourage 80,000 employees who didn't vote in 2000 to go to the polls, a move that could boost pro-business turnout. The U.S. Chamber of Commerce is running a similar program in Minnesota.

Company efforts have been extended to overseas employees. Many of Caterpillar Inc.'s 37,000 expatriate workers are located far from capital cities where U.S. embassies are situated, making it hard to figure out absentee-ballot voting procedures. Using software designed for the purpose, employees can now download ballots and easily find information on deadlines and where to mail their votes.

The heavy equipment and engine manufacturer says it doesn't endorse candidates, but its Web site does provide candidates' voting history on critical issues such as trade. John T. Disharoon, a Brussels-based public-affairs official, downloaded absentee ballot request forms for him and his wife, shaving six weeks off the process. That's given them "plenty of time to mull things over, fill them out and make sure our vote is counted."



2006 budget includes 29 billion in pork barrel spending { April 5 2006 }
2006 elections could be most costly in history { October 24 2006 }
Abramoff tribes donated funds to lawmakers
Airlines gave congress { October 20 1999 }
Airlines spend millions { October 14 2002 }
Avoid softmoney ban { November 2 2002 }
Biggest defense contractors heavy lobby influence in washington
Bribed congressman wore wire in plea deal
Bush fundraiser { June 13 2002 }
Bush insider trading { July 3 2002 }
Bush loans { July 11 2002 }
Bush photos with abramoff defended by whitehouse { January 23 2006 }
Bush raised 90 mill
Bush raising artform { October 17 2002 }
Business groups to cut funds to representatives over cafta { June 12 2005 }
California congressman admits taking bribes
California republican takes from foreign lobbies { November 3 2006 }
Campaign fiance fails test { November 27 2002 }
Campaign finance law struck down { May 2 2003 }
Cheney suit dismissed { December 9 2002 }
Cia deputy house searched over congress bribery { May 12 2006 }
Companies make employees donate political campaigns { September 3 2004 }
Congress members taken 16m in privately financed trips
Congressman gets homes yachts antique furnishings
Congressman lobby job heightens revolving door fear { December 17 2004 }
Congressman takes 100k in bribes
Corrupt congress has lobbyist write their legislation { October 27 2006 }
Defense contractor pleads guilty to briding lawmaker { February 25 2006 }
Delay aides face charges on cracker barrel funds { September 22 2004 }
Democrats travel costs linked to lobbyist { May 4 2005 }
Details of maryland soft money { September 25 2003 }
Developer paid lawmakers for county highway
Drugmakers are biggest lobby to sway congress
Finance loopholes { June 21 2002 }
Former lobbyist gets 2 million { July 10 2006 }
Gop threats halted gao cheney suit { February 19 2003 }
Hill leaders often take corporate jets { May 5 2005 }
Indian tribes pay 45m to lobbyists
Influence peddling in congress prosperous industry { June 22 2005 }
Justices split on campaign finance { September 9 2003 }
Ken starr fights finance
Lawmakers lobbyists keep constant contact { June 28 2004 }
Lobbyist abramoff buys ohio congressman { October 18 2005 }
Lobbyist laundered tribal funds to israel
Mccain accuses softmoney corrupts colleagues { October 15 1999 }
Most polled say both parties corrupt { December 2005 }
New campaign finance { July 9 2002 }
New soft money { August 25 2002 }
No ethics rules stop lawmakers accepting bribes { August 4 2005 }
Ohio congressman takes scotland trip by scanlon
One billion on ads
Pelosi accused pork barrel { February 21 2003 }
Perdue pushes ethics on firm lawmaker revolving door
Pork increases with lawmakers earmarks { January 27 2006 }
Power came with plate for lobbyist abramoff { July 6 2005 }
Push bush probe { July 21 2002 }
Senate deal offers tobacco regulation buyout of growers
Senate OKs bill to protect corporations from lawsuits
Senator kills political finance reform { October 12 1999 }
Senator reid calls congress most corrupt in history
Some in gop regretting pork stuffed highway bill { November 5 2005 }
Supreme court mccain feingold ruling { December 11 2003 }
White house environment advisor gets job at exxonmobile

Files Listed: 63



Correction/submissions

CIA FOIA Archive

National Security
Archives
Support one-state solution for Israel and Palestine Tea Party bumper stickers JFK for Dummies, The Assassination made simple