NewsMine — cabal-elite — corporate — microsoft — Viewing Item

Goog email to compete with microsoft yahoo { April 2 2004 } Original Source Link: (May no longer be active)    http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-google2apr02,1,6221287.story http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-google2apr02,1,6221287.story Google's E-Mail Strategy Criticized New Gmail service scans messages and attaches targeted ads to them, raising privacy fears. By Chris Gaither Times Staff Writer April 2, 2004 Privacy advocates are concerned that there's one big flaw with Google Inc.'s free e-mail service: The company plans to read the messages. The Internet search firm insists that it needs to know what's in the e-mails that pass through its system — so that they can be sprinkled with advertisements Google thinks are relevant. After all, revenue from those targeted ads will pay for the Gmail service, which began a limited test Thursday, offering up to 500 times as much e-mail storage as competing Web e-mail programs from Yahoo Inc. and Microsoft Corp. The electronic letters won't be read by Google employees; computers will handle that chore. Nonetheless, the specter of seeing an ad for an antacid beside a message from a friend complaining about stomach pain is enough to make some people nervous about the e-mail service. "There will undoubtedly be some folks that will see this and freak out," said Ray Everett-Church, chief privacy officer for TurnTide Inc., an anti-spam company in Conshohocken, Pa. The aggressive advertising strategy may put a damper on Google's biggest move yet away from its core business of Internet search. After reading the privacy policy on the Gmail website Thursday, consumer-rights groups began sending complaints to the privately held Mountain View, Calif., company and preparing to warn users to stay away. "The privacy implications of going through and perusing a customer's e-mail to display targeted advertising could be the Achilles' heel for Google's services," said Jordana Beebe, the communications director for the Privacy Rights Clearinghouse, an consumer group in San Diego. The consternation caught Larry Page, Google's co-founder and president of products, off guard. "I'm very surprised that there are these kinds of questions," he said Thursday. There are several reasons. For starters, spam-filtering programs routinely scour e-mails for telltale words such as "Viagra," and companies monitor the message traffic of employees on their corporate networks. In addition, Internet companies already scrutinize Web search terms in order to serve up ads that are related to the topic a user cares about. And Google's AdSense program already goes a step further, placing such ads alongside content on websites that come up in search results. But e-mail is a more personal form of communication, making targeted advertisements feel intrusive, said Chris Hoofnagle, associate director of the Electronic Privacy Information Center in Washington. He likened the Gmail ads to a computerized voice interrupting a phone conversation about a vacation with a pitch for a travel agency. "This is an expansion in a way that should bother people," Hoofnagle said. "Communications are sacred." Consumer advocates are also worried about the potential for Google to link Gmail users to their Internet searches. Google records the numerical Internet addresses of the computers that request each of the Web searches the company performs. But it hasn't had names or other identifying information to link those addresses to specific people and learn who, for example, is searching for "Janet Jackson halftime show." Once users register for Gmail, Google would be able to make that connection, if it chose to, said Pam Dixon, executive director of the World Privacy Forum in San Diego. And if Google ever compared the two sets of data, she said, "there are some people who would be chilled and embarrassed." Page wouldn't say whether Google planned to link Gmail users to their Web search queries. "It might be really useful for us to know that information" to make search results better, he said. "I'd hate to rule anything like that out." But he insisted that the company would protect user privacy and takes the issue "very, very seriously." "We want people in the world to be able to trust Google," he said, "and we view that as an important part of our business."

Aol joins microsoft alliance { May 30 2003 } Arrest coming blaster attack { August 29 2003 } Asian nations promote alternative to microsoft { April 3 2004 } Beijing allegedly dumps windows 2000 for linux { January 7 2000 } Bill gates meets tom ridge Bill gates says dont fear outsourcing Bonk windows security hole College kid wants apology before dropping microsoft lawsuit Eu hits microsoft with 613m fine Eu regulators to discussion commision ruling against microsoft Gates foundation invests in harmful oil companies { January 7 2007 } Gates foundation invests in harmful sub prime lenders { January 8 2007 } Goog email to compete with microsoft yahoo { April 2 2004 } Hacker hits microsoft internet server { November 6 2000 } Judge bash microsoft Lawsuit for damaged against microsoft Linux proves a winner down under { November 26 2003 } Microsoft fixes force work on veterans day { November 11 2003 } Microsoft lobbys pentagon { May 23 2002 } Microsoft pays congress { October 15 1999 } Microsoft pays social conservative ralph reed Microsoft reaches 1 6b settlement with sun Microsoft to pay shareholders up to 75b Microsoft wants google { October 31 2003 } Military microsoft contracts lax on nt security { May 6 1998 } Security report blames microsoft for security { September 24 2003 } Teekid blast author arrested Walmart snubs microsoft with new laptop Warnings against microsoft internet explorer security holes { July 12 2004 } Windows nt hackers best friend { January 11 2001 } Windows to require key for updates { July 26 2005 } Worm snarles lockheed martin Worm virus says gates fix software Files Listed: 33

Correction/submissions

CIA FOIA Archive

National Security Archives

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information, go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purpose of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.