News and Document archive source
copyrighted material disclaimer at bottom of page

NewsMinecabal-elitecorporatefilesharing-p2p — Viewing Item


Us sides with record labels against verizon { April 18 2003 }

Original Source Link: (May no longer be active)
   http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A53387-2003Apr18.html

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A53387-2003Apr18.html

U.S. Sides with Record Labels in Internet Case


By Andy Sullivan
Reuters
Friday, April 18, 2003; 9:20 PM


WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. government sided with the recording industry in its dispute with Verizon Communications Inc. on Friday, saying a digital-copyright law invoked by record labels to track down Internet song-swappers did not violate the U.S. Constitution.

The move, while expected, came as a blow to the Internet provider as it struggles to shield its customers.

"We would have expected they would have recognized there are important privacy and safety issues beyond the narrow copyright claims here," Verizon Vice President Sarah Deutsch, who is also associate general counsel, told Reuters.

Verizon, and a recording-industry trade group have been in court since September, arguing over whether Verizon should be forced to help crack down on the online song-swapping that record labels blame for a decline in CD sales.

The Recording Industry Association of America says Verizon is required under law to help its members protect their copyrights. Verizon says it is willing to help, but that the law only applies to Web pages stored on its computers, not the "peer to peer" networks like Kazaa that merely travel across its wires.

A district court sided with the recording industry in January. Verizon appealed the decision, and is arguing that the names of suspected copyright violators should not be revealed in the meantime.

Verizon argues that the law in question, the 1998 Digital Millennium Copyright Act, known as the DMCA, violates free-speech and due-process rights protected by the U.S. Constitution.

In a filing with the U.S. District Court in Washington, the Department of Justice said the law is not unconstitutional. The Justice Department is required to weigh in on cases where constitutional issues are raised.

Deutsch said she was disappointed that the Justice Department would take such a stand, as stalkers and other criminals could conceivably use the law to track down victims.

RIAA WELCOMES RULING

"The government's filing today supports the proposition that we have long advocated: copyright owners have a clear and unambiguous entitlement to determine who is infringing their copyrights online and that entitlement is constitutional," said Matt Oppenheimer, Senior Vice President for Business and Legal Affairs at the RIAA.

"Verizon's persistent efforts to protect copy thieves on pirate peer-to-peer networks will not succeed," he told Reuters.

Justice said the law did not violate the free-speech rights of everyday users because it is only targeted at those who violate copyrights.

"It is manifest that the DMCA's subpoena provision targets the identity of alleged copyright infringers, not spoken words or conduct commonly associated with expression," Justice said.

Justice also said that the law did not violate due-process protections because nothing in the Constitution specifically barred the investigative process set up by the DMCA, which requires record labels to get approval from a court clerk before asking Verizon or other Internet providers to surrender customer names.

Verizon argues that record labels should be required to get permission from a judge, rather than a clerk, a move that would add another legal hurdle to any copyright investigation.

Verizon says such a move is necessary to protect user privacy because otherwise any copyright holder -- or anybody claiming to be a copyright holder -- could easily obtain the name and address of any Internet user.


© 2003 Reuters




12 yr old sued { September 9 2003 }
Artists defend free downloading
Byrds vs metallica [jpg]
Cd sales drop
Chuck d says power to people
College students sued for sharing music { April 4 2003 }
Daughter downloads get mom sued { December 7 2003 }
Defend napster 6 5 03 [jpg]
Destroy computers of downloaders { June 17 2003 }
Downloads scoff at music industry
Dutch court throws out control of kazaa { December 19 2003 }
Falsehoods ian
Fed busts underground file sharing sites { August 25 2004 }
File sharers switch to other services { November 12 2003 }
File sharing ruled legal canada
File sharing sites not liable for infringement { August 20 2004 }
File swap not infringing { April 26 2003 }
File swapper takes on riaa { August 22 2003 }
Firm to forgive repentant song downloaders { September 5 2003 }
Girl 12 settles piracy suit 2k
Grokster to shut down under legal settlement
House panel approves copyright bill increase penalties { March 31 2004 }
How riaa tracks downloaders
Hundreds of music swappers sued
Industry now sites pornography { September 7 2003 }
Judge file swapping legal { April 26 2003 }
Judge rejects riaa subpoenas
Kazaa most downloaded program
Lawsuit kazaar
Lifeline ian { February 2 2003 }
Metallica vs byrds
Methods that would make george orwell blush { August 22 2003 }
Mit fights subpoenas
Music downloads up 27 percent one year { April 27 2004 }
Music industry sues 744 more file sharers
Musicians caught in middle { September 14 2003 }
Napster deal with penn state for students
Napster to reenter net music { October 10 2003 }
P2p war
Radiohead tops charts after shunning music industry { January 10 2008 }
Record company investigators raided australian universities { February 6 2004 }
Record industry may not subpoena providers
Record industry sues 532 more file sharers { March 23 2004 }
Recording industry subpoenas sharers
Riaa lawsuits against file traders { June 25 2003 }
Riaa nails 1000 in jihad
Riaa not targeting small downloaders
RIAA sues 493 more music swappers { May 24 2004 }
Riaa sues 531 suspected music pirates { February 17 2004 }
Scotch tape stymies sony music rip protection
Single mom overwhelmed by recording industry lawsuit { May 26 2004 }
Software thwart sharing { May 4 2003 }
Sony sued for spyware on music cds
Student sued by music industry { April 4 2003 }
Student sued for paper cd copying { October 9 2003 }
Teens feel sharing should be legal { September 8 2003 }
Teens ok filesharing
Tower records bankruptcy blamed on downloads { February 5 2004 }
Tracking music file sharing
University file sharing orientation { August 28 2003 }
US sees growth in its CD sales market { January 6 2005 }
Us sides with record labels against verizon { April 18 2003 }
Verizon turns over names { June 6 2003 }

Files Listed: 63



Correction/submissions

CIA FOIA Archive

National Security
Archives
Support one-state solution for Israel and Palestine Tea Party bumper stickers JFK for Dummies, The Assassination made simple