News and Document archive source
copyrighted material disclaimer at bottom of page

NewsMinecabal-elitecorporatefilesharing-p2p — Viewing Item


Lifeline ian { February 2 2003 }

Original Source Link: (May no longer be active)
   http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/suncommentary/la-oe-ian2feb02,0,2630989.story?coll=la%2Dheadlines%2Dsuncomment

http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/suncommentary/la-oe-ian2feb02,0,2630989.story?coll=la%2Dheadlines%2Dsuncomment

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/suncommentary/la-oe-ian2feb02,0,2630989.story?coll=la%2Dheadlines%2Dsuncomment

COMMENTARY
Don't Sever a High-Tech Lifeline for Musicians
By Janis Ian

February 2 2003

The Recording Industry Assn. of America recently won a court ruling that effectively will cut off the recording artists it represents from new listeners.

In RIAA vs. Verizon, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia ruled that anyone suspected of downloading so-called "infringing" files on the Internet -- usually an MP3 of a song -- could be sued. No evidence is required. An accuser fills out a form for a court clerk and the machinery is set in motion.

The record companies say this decision will mean more money for musicians, but they have it backward. The downloaded music they're shutting off actually creates sales by exposing artists to new fans.

If this ruling stands, many smaller musicians will be hurt financially, and many will be pushed out of the music business altogether.

I've been a recording artist for nearly 40 years, with top-selling songs such as "Society's Child," "At Seventeen" and "Jesse." Six months ago, I began offering free downloads of my songs on my Web site. Thousands of people have downloaded my music since then -- and they're not trying to steal. They're just looking for music they can no longer find on the tight playlists of their local radio stations.

That's how many artists gain new listeners these days -- through the Internet.

After I first posted downloadable music, my merchandise sales went up 300%. They're still double what they were before the MP3s went online.

I'm not going to make a fortune selling these extra recordings, but it does add up to a few thousand dollars a year. That's a welcome bit of additional income for me and for the vast majority of artists who don't sell as many records as Nelly and Ja Rule.

The Internet means exposure, and these days, unless you're in the Top 40, you're not getting on the radio. The Internet is the only outlet for many artists to be heard by an audience bigger than whoever shows up at a local coffeehouse. The Internet allows people like me to gain new fans; if only 10% of those downloading my music buy my records or come to my shows, I've just gained enough fans to fill Carnegie Hall twice over.

With the court's decision, the RIAA didn't just defeat Verizon, the Internet service provider that the RIAA sued. It damaged the viability of recording artists who don't conform to the mainstream musical tastes of the moment.

Do you like '50s-style acoustic folk? Big band music? European synth? If the decision stands, you'll have to rely on word of mouth to find it -- not the Internet. Because if you get hold of an "infringing" file, you may find yourself on the receiving end of a record company lawsuit too expensive for any individual to fight.

The entertainment industry has a long history of trying to shut down new technology. Most often, it has imagined that new products and services threatened industry sales. It's been proved wrong time and time again; it fought home video tooth and nail, but videotapes and rentals now bring in more money than movie releases. Music history is littered with record industry campaigns against reel-to-reel home tape recorders, cassettes, minidiscs, music videos and MTV.

Verizon is appealing the decision, and it is vital that the judge's ruling be overturned.

The RIAA says it is doing all this to make more money for me and other artists like me, but don't be fooled. Many musicians would lose money, many fans would be denied a universe of new choices and the possibilities of Internet music would be cut off before the revolution even begins.

*

Janis Ian is a singer, songwriter and recording artist with nine Grammy nominations. Web site: www.JanisIan.com.
If you want other stories on this topic, search the Archives at latimes.com/archives. For information about reprinting this article, go to www.lats.com/rights.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



12 yr old sued { September 9 2003 }
Artists defend free downloading
Byrds vs metallica [jpg]
Cd sales drop
Chuck d says power to people
College students sued for sharing music { April 4 2003 }
Daughter downloads get mom sued { December 7 2003 }
Defend napster 6 5 03 [jpg]
Destroy computers of downloaders { June 17 2003 }
Downloads scoff at music industry
Dutch court throws out control of kazaa { December 19 2003 }
Falsehoods ian
Fed busts underground file sharing sites { August 25 2004 }
File sharers switch to other services { November 12 2003 }
File sharing ruled legal canada
File sharing sites not liable for infringement { August 20 2004 }
File swap not infringing { April 26 2003 }
File swapper takes on riaa { August 22 2003 }
Firm to forgive repentant song downloaders { September 5 2003 }
Girl 12 settles piracy suit 2k
Grokster to shut down under legal settlement
House panel approves copyright bill increase penalties { March 31 2004 }
How riaa tracks downloaders
Hundreds of music swappers sued
Industry now sites pornography { September 7 2003 }
Judge file swapping legal { April 26 2003 }
Judge rejects riaa subpoenas
Kazaa most downloaded program
Lawsuit kazaar
Lifeline ian { February 2 2003 }
Metallica vs byrds
Methods that would make george orwell blush { August 22 2003 }
Mit fights subpoenas
Music downloads up 27 percent one year { April 27 2004 }
Music industry sues 744 more file sharers
Musicians caught in middle { September 14 2003 }
Napster deal with penn state for students
Napster to reenter net music { October 10 2003 }
P2p war
Radiohead tops charts after shunning music industry { January 10 2008 }
Record company investigators raided australian universities { February 6 2004 }
Record industry may not subpoena providers
Record industry sues 532 more file sharers { March 23 2004 }
Recording industry subpoenas sharers
Riaa lawsuits against file traders { June 25 2003 }
Riaa nails 1000 in jihad
Riaa not targeting small downloaders
RIAA sues 493 more music swappers { May 24 2004 }
Riaa sues 531 suspected music pirates { February 17 2004 }
Scotch tape stymies sony music rip protection
Single mom overwhelmed by recording industry lawsuit { May 26 2004 }
Software thwart sharing { May 4 2003 }
Sony sued for spyware on music cds
Student sued by music industry { April 4 2003 }
Student sued for paper cd copying { October 9 2003 }
Teens feel sharing should be legal { September 8 2003 }
Teens ok filesharing
Tower records bankruptcy blamed on downloads { February 5 2004 }
Tracking music file sharing
University file sharing orientation { August 28 2003 }
US sees growth in its CD sales market { January 6 2005 }
Us sides with record labels against verizon { April 18 2003 }
Verizon turns over names { June 6 2003 }

Files Listed: 63



Correction/submissions

CIA FOIA Archive

National Security
Archives
Support one-state solution for Israel and Palestine Tea Party bumper stickers JFK for Dummies, The Assassination made simple