| Pentagon auditors altered files { January 10 2004 } Original Source Link: (May no longer be active) http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dallas/nation/stories/011104dnnatpentagon.6986c.htmlhttp://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dallas/nation/stories/011104dnnatpentagon.6986c.html
Report: Pentagon auditors altered files Inquiry shows agency spent the equivalent of 47 days doctoring data
08:37 PM CST on Saturday, January 10, 2004
Associated Press
WASHINGTON – Pentagon auditors spent 1,139 hours altering their own files to pass an internal review, say investigators who found that the accounting sleuths engaged in just the kind of wasteful activity they are supposed to expose.
When the auditors in the New York City office learned well in advance which files a review team would check, they spent the equivalent of more than 47 days doctoring the papers and updating records from several audits, the Defense Department's inspector-general concluded. Administrative staff, audit supervisors and other employees also participated in the alterations.
The fabrication at the Defense Contract Audit Agency "certainly violates the spirit and intent" of government auditing standards and rules on ethical conduct, according to the inspector-general's report, obtained by The Associated Press.
The defense agency, which audits government contracts, recently reported that Vice President Dick Cheney's former company, Halliburton, may have overcharged the Army as much as $61 million for gasoline in Iraq.
The audit agency ran up some charges of its own when its auditors worked on altering the records.
The task of rewriting the files was so daunting that auditors came in from other offices to help make the changes, costing taxpayers more than $1,600 in travel expenses.
The agency "is supposed to be the watchdog for defense contracts," said Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, a constant critic of government waste. "Altering audit work papers could undermine the accuracy of the Pentagon's cost reports. Falsifying official reports is a crime, and those involved must be held accountable."
To stop any fabrications in the future, the review teams only give 48 hours' notice for the files they want to inspect. The advance time under the old policy was much longer.
Discipline was proposed for the manager who directed the alterations but was never imposed because the official resigned, the report said.
Daniel Tucciarone, executive officer of the audit agency, said a second senior management official who "had not been forthcoming and acted inappropriately to conceal information" was punished.
Mr. Tucciarone told the AP that the agency took "appropriate disciplinary action in all cases" but that federal privacy law prevented him from releasing such information about individual employees.
The revisions were so pervasive that the work continued even after the review team arrived to inspect the auditors' files. The New York branch manager directed a senior auditor to delete electronic backup files of original documents, the inspector general said.
The report said agency employees believed that "upgrading" the working papers was normal and acceptable and that they did not try to hide what they were doing.
|
|