News and Document archive source
copyrighted material disclaimer at bottom of page

NewsMinecabal-elitecorporatedefense — Viewing Item


Ex seal tests new weapon on iraqi { November 24 2003 }

Original Source Link: (May no longer be active)
   http://www.armytimes.com/story.php?f=1-292925-2426405.php

http://www.armytimes.com/story.php?f=1-292925-2426405.php

November 24, 2003

1-shot killer
This 5.56mm round has all the stopping power you need - but you can’t use it. Here’s why:

By John G. Roos
Special to the Times

Ben Thomas and three colleagues were driving north out of Baghdad in an SUV on a clear mid-September morning, headed down a dirt road into a rural village, when gunmen in several surrounding buildings opened fire on them.

In a brief but intense firefight, Thomas hit one of the attackers with a single shot from his M4 carbine at a distance he estimates was 100 to 110 yards.

He hit the man in the buttocks [the attacker was facing the other way?], a wound that typically is not fatal. But this round appeared to kill the assailant instantly.

"It entered his butt and completely destroyed everything in the lower left section of his stomach ... everything was torn apart," Thomas said.

Thomas, a security consultant with a private company contracted by the government, recorded the first known enemy kill using a new - and controversial - bullet.

The bullet is so controversial that if Thomas, a former SEAL, had been on active duty, he would have been court-martialed for using it. The ammunition is "nonstandard" and hasn’t passed the military’s approval process.

"The way I explain what happened to people who weren’t there is - this stuff was like hitting somebody with a miniature explosive round," he said, even though the ammo does not have an explosive tip. "Nobody believed that this guy died from a butt shot."

The bullet Thomas fired was an armor-piercing, limited-penetration round manufactured by RBCD of San Antonio.

A new process

APLP ammo is manufactured using a so-called "blended-metal" process, said Stan Bulmer, president of sales and manufacturing for Le Mas Ltd. of Little Rock, Ark. Le Mas is the distributor of RBCD ammo.

Various bullet types made by RBCD are designed for different effects, Bulmer said.

The frangible APLP ammo will bore through steel and other hard targets but will not pass through a human torso, an eight-inch-thick block of artist’s clay or even several layers of drywall. Instead of passing through a body, it shatters, creating "untreatable wounds."

Le Mas gave Thomas a small number of APLP rounds after he contacted the company.

After driving off their attackers, Thomas and his colleagues quickly searched the downed enemy fighter for items of intelligence value. They also took time to examine the wound.

"There’s absolutely no comparison, whatever, none," to other wounds he has seen from 5.56mm ammo, Thomas said in a telephone interview while on home leave in Florida.

He said he feels qualified to assess a bullet’s effects, having trained as a special-operations medic and having shot people with various types of ammo, including the standard-issue green tip and the Black Hills Mk 262, favored by spec-ops troops.

Thomas was the only member of the four-man group who had RBCD ammo. He said that after the group returned to base, they and other members of his group snatched up the remaining rounds.

"They were fighting over it," he said. "At the end of the day, each of us took five rounds. That’s all we had left."

Congress wants tests

Last year’s defense budget included $1.05 million for testing blended-metal bullets, Bulmer said. Fourteen months into the 24-month period during which those research and development-testing funds must be spent, the military has not purchased a single bullet from Le Mas.

Publicly, at least, military officials say RBCD ammo is no more effective than other types now in use and, under certain conditions, doesn’t even perform as well. Those conclusions are derived from a series of tests conducted a few years ago in which RBCD ammo’s effects were observed in ballistic gelatin, the standard means for testing bullets.

Naval Reserve Lt. Cmdr. Gary Roberts, a recognized ballistics expert and member of the International Wound Ballistics Association, conducted the gelatin tests in March 2002.

According to his findings, "Claims that RBCD bullet terminal performance can vary depending on target thickness, size or mass were not shown to have merit, as bullet performance remained consistent irrespective of gelatin block size."

Roberts found that in gelatin, a 9mm, 60-grain slug exhibited "tissue damage comparable to that of other nonexpanding 9mm bullets and is less than that of standard 9mm [jacketed hollow point] designs, since the RBCD bullet does not create as much tissue damage due to its smaller recovered diameter."

A .45-caliber bullet "offered average terminal performance in bare and denim-clad gelatin, similar to that noted with the 9mm bullet. ... The RBCD bullets do not appear to be a true frangible design, as significant mass is retained after striking a target."

Not surprisingly, Roberts’ assessment remains a major impediment to getting RBCD ammo into military hands. Considering his standing in the ballistics community, his findings are accepted as gospel by many influential members of the special-operations community.

But Bulmer insists that tests in ballistic gelatin fail to demonstrate RBCD ammo’s actual performance because the gelatin is chilled to 36 degrees. Their bullets seem to shatter most effectively only when they strike warmer targets, such as live tissue. Bulmer said tests using live animals clearly would show its effects. Despite his appeals for such testing, and the funds set aside by Congress to conduct new tests, the military refuses.

Bulmer said authority to spend the testing funds initially went to U.S. Special Operations Command in Tampa, Fla., which delegated testing responsibility to the Army Special Operations Command at Fort Bragg, N.C.

Queries to the command confirmed that it was aware of the testing requirement but had not decided when, or if, the tests will be conducted.

Bill Skipper, president and CEO of the American Business Development Group, is a lobbyist representing Le Mas on Capitol Hill. "When I heard of the ballistic characteristics of this ammo, as a retired military officer, I realized it has to stay in the good guys’ hands," he said, adding that SOCom’s reluctance to test it is "irresponsible."

"This is an issue of national security," he said.

Some supporters of RBCD ammunition suggest SOCom officials may be reluctant to test the ammo because it threatens "in-house" weapons and ammunition programs underway at the command.

Special-operations forces long have sought a more potent standard round than the 5.56mm, which lacks the punch needed during the long-distance engagements that frequently occur in Afghanistan and Iraq. In response, SOCom is working with weapons and ammunition manufacturers to develop a new round and new upper receivers for M4 and M16 rifles.

The command apparently has narrowed its search to a 6.8-by-43mm round.

Indication of industries’ involvement in this effort was seen in October during the annual Association of the U.S. Army exhibition in Washington.

If Le Mas’ 5.56mm APLP round delivers the performance SOCom is seeking in the new 6.8mm ammo - and Bulmer insists it does - the rationale and the potentially lucrative contracts for producing a new ammo type and modifying thousands of weapons used by special-operations forces would disappear.

Thomas said he isn’t familiar with the reasons that might keep RBCD ammo from getting a realistic test within the military.

"The politics, that’s above my pay grade," he said. "All I really care about is that I have the best-performing weapon, optics, communications, medical equipment, etc. I’m taking Le Mas ammo with me when I return to Iraq, and I’ve already promised lots of this ammo to my buddies who were there that day and to their friends."

When military officials in the United States got wind that Thomas had used the round, he quickly found himself in the midst of an online debate in which an unnamed officer, who mistakenly assumed Thomas was in the service, threatened him with a court martial for using the nonstandard ammo.

Although Thomas was impressed by RBCD ammo’s performance, he feels it should not be the standard ammunition issued to all U.S. forces.

"The first thing I say when I talk to people about Le Mas’ ammo is, make sure that 22-year-old infantrymen don’t get a hold of this, because if they have an accident ... if they have a negligent discharge, that person is dead. It doesn’t matter how much body armor you have on.

"This is purely for putting into bad guys. For general inventory, absolutely not. For special operations, I wouldn’t carry anything else."

A video clip on RBCD ammo that was shot at the annual Armed Forces Journal Shootout at Blackwater is online at www.armedforcesjournal.com/bullets.

John G. Roos is editor of Armed Forces Journal.



baker-carlyle
Army cancels comanche helicopter { February 24 2004 }
Boeing dismisses 2 in ethical misconduct { November 25 2003 }
Boeing disputes lockheed lawsuit { July 31 2003 }
Boeing gets waiver from airforce { August 30 2003 }
Boeing investigated process behind 1998 af contract { September 13 2003 }
Boeing may be hit by 700m in charges { March 5 2004 }
Boeing receives 1b tax refund
Boeing tactics remain under scrutiny after condit resignation
Boeing tankers deal put on hold
Boeing third official charged with lockheed data theft { May 12 2004 }
Boeing ties with civilian group defence policy board { December 7 2003 }
Boeing wins contract army modernization { May 16 2003 }
Boeing wins tax refund of 1b settlement { November 26 2003 }
British aerospace boeing manufacturing deal
Carlyle cia { April 15 2003 }
Carlyle crusader { May 14 2002 }
Carlyle invests in ezpass company { July 15 2003 }
Carlyle revolving door defense business { August 5 2003 }
Defense contractor admitted briding congressman
Defense contractors bribe saudi 2 billion { June 10 2008 }
Defense stocks surge after bush win
Dyncorp police iraq police bosnia sex scandal
Dyncorp sex slave scandal
Dyncorp trafficking sex
Ex presidents club { October 31 2001 }
Ex seal tests new weapon on iraqi { November 24 2003 }
Ge beats french bid for sophia
Ge military arms
Ge nbc vivendi universal merger { October 8 2003 }
Ge stalking amersham
Ge to buy british medical firm
General dynamics to buy uk defence rival { March 11 2004 }
General electric record earnings { March 2006 }
Half pentagon budget goes to private contractors { September 30 2004 }
Iraq contract corruption probe { July 7 2004 }
Lockheed acquired titan { September 16 2003 }
Lockheed anim [gif]
Lockheed halliburton beoing profit from mars { January 16 2004 }
Lockheed martin chief pentagon { June 27 2003 }
Lockheed martin profits up by war { April 23 2003 }
Lockheed to provide new york subway security { August 23 2005 }
Military expo [jpg]
Military expo { September 18 2002 }
No bid defense contracts found common { September 30 2004 }
Northrop gets 48m deal train iraq army { June 30 2004 }
Pentagon auditors altered files { January 10 2004 }
Pentagon overpays 20m to fraud supplier
Protests at lockheed martin { April 23 2003 }
Turbulence at boeing timeline { December 1 2003 }
UK overtakes US as biggest weapons exporter { June 17 2008 }
Us private army grows { September 3 2003 }
Vast military arms buildup making industry rich { October 1 2004 }
Vinnell train pull triggers { March 20 2003 }
War profiteering

Files Listed: 54



Correction/submissions

CIA FOIA Archive

National Security
Archives
Support one-state solution for Israel and Palestine Tea Party bumper stickers JFK for Dummies, The Assassination made simple