News and Document archive source
copyrighted material disclaimer at bottom of page
NewsMine cabal-elite w-administration judicial roberts Viewing Item | Recent opinions by judge roberts { July 20 2005 } Original Source Link: (May no longer be active) http://www.latimes.com/la-na-decisions20jul20,0,5114988.story?coll=la-home-headlineshttp://www.latimes.com/la-na-decisions20jul20,0,5114988.story?coll=la-home-headlines
Recent opinions by Judge Roberts Los Angeles Times
July 20, 2005
Judge John G. Roberts Jr. of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit has a reputation as a strong conservative. He served in the administrations of presidents Reagan and George H.W. Bush before his appointment as a federal judge a little more than two years ago. Some of his notable court opinions:
Abortion
As a lawyer in the first Bush administration, Roberts co-wrote a brief that stated, "We continue to believe that Roe was wrongly decided and should be overruled."
During his 2003 appeals court confirmation hearing, Roberts said: "Roe vs. Wade is the settled law of the land.... There's nothing in my personal views that would prevent me from fully and faithfully applying that precedent."
4th and 5th amendments
Roberts upheld the arrest of a 12-year-old girl for eating a French fry in a Washington Metrorail station. (Hedgepeth vs. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, 2004)
Endangered species
Roberts asked the court to reconsider protection of the arroyo toad under the Endangered Species Act, arguing that there was no interstate commerce rationale for protecting a species that lives only in California. (Rancho Viejo vs. Norton, 2003)
Search and seizure
Roberts rejected challenges to a bank robbery conviction, upholding a warrantless search of the defendant's car. (U.S. vs. Lawson, 2005)
Sources: Associated Press, Justice Department Office of Legal Policy, Law.com, Supreme Court Nomination Blog. Graphics reporting by Brady MacDonald
|
| Files Listed: 8 |
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been
specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material
available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political,
human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc.
We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as
provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with
Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without
profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included
information for research and educational purposes. For more information,
go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use
copyrighted material from this site for purpose of your own that go beyond
'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
|