News and Document archive source
copyrighted material disclaimer at bottom of page

NewsMine9-11wtc-collapse — Viewing Item


Stephen jones attacked on msnbc

Original Source Link: (May no longer be active)
   http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10053445/

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10053445/

Questioning what happened on 9/11
Professor believes planes didn't cause all the damage around the WTC
TRANSCRIPT
MSNBC
Updated: 1:10 p.m. ET Nov 16, 2005

Millions of people watched the horror of 9/11 right before their very eyes, live on television. Two planes, crashing into the World Trade Center. Less than a couple of hours later, both towers, of course, collapsing.

On Monday, Tucker Carlson welcomed Brigham Young University Professor Steven Jones to the 'Situation.' Jones, a professor of physics, believes that the hijackers may not have brought down the towers by themselves.

To read an excerpt of their conversation, continue to the text below. To watch the video, click on the "Launch" button to the right.

TUCKER CARLSON: Well, just sum up this-obviously your theory, just the one sentence that I just explained, in the intro, contradicts what we all think we know about how these towers collapsed. Quickly sum up your explanation for what's happened.

STEVEN JONES, BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY: ... What I'm doing, Tucker, is presenting evidence, but it's a hypothesis to be tested. That's a big difference from a conclusion, and so I just wanted to clarify that. But to sum up that I have looked at the official reports by FEMA, and so on... regarding the collapse of-yes, of these buildings. ...

I'd like to look at the collapse of building seven in just a minute. It was not even hit by a jet. So we'll look at that one.

CARLSON: The two towers. The explanation has been that the fire inside was so intense that it weakened the structural steel and that each floor collapsed down upon the next in a pancake fashion, and they imploded in on themselves. That's essentially, I think, what people think.

JONES: Yes, that's basically it, yes. And so what I've done is to analyze these reports.

I would like to do a little experiment with you, Tucker, if I could. I sent out a video clip of the collapse of Building seven, because most people haven't actually seen that one, and that's the crux of the argument.

CARLSON: Can you sum up very quickly the argument for us? You believe there were explosives in the buildings planted by someone, detonated?

JONES: Well, yes.

CARLSON: Is that correct?

JONES: ... There are two hypotheses here. One is fire and damage caused all three buildings to collapse.

CARLSON: OK.

JONES: The other is that explosives in the buildings may have caused the collapse. And so, then we analyze and see which fits the data better, and I've done that in my 25-page paper.

CARLSON: I want to read you a quote from the 'Deseret Morning News,' a paper in Utah, from you. I'm quoting now.

"It is quite plausible that explosives were pre-planted in all three buildings and set off after the two plane crashes, which are actually a diversion tactic. Muslims are probably not to blame for bringing down the World Trade Center buildings after all."

That's, I would think, pretty offensive to a lot of the people listening. Do you have any evidence for that?

JONES: Well, not-not to the Muslims, I might say.

CARLSON: Well, that's good.

JONES: I have a lot of e-mails.

CARLSON: I'm sure your writings greeted with just glee in Islamabad, and Peshawar and places like that. But for Americans.

JONES: Well, I haven't received notes from there, but just good people. I have Muslim friends. Let me read, for example, but I'm not going to let you off the hook. I really want to do this experiment with you.

CARLSON: We don't have a lot of time for experiments, Professor. But if you could just ... give us one thing to hold onto. How-you make these claims, or appear to make these claims ...

JONES: Tucker, sure, sure. Let's start with the collapse of Building seven. Can you roll the video clip that I sent to you?

CARLSON: OK. I am not sure if we can, but that is the World Trade Center. It's smaller than the other two it was not hit by a plane.

JONES: Let's try.

CARLSON: Of course, it collapsed.

JONES: Right. It's 47 stories.

CARLSON: That's right.

JONES: Twenty-four steel columns in the center.

CARLSON: Right.

JONES: Trusses, asymmetrically supported. Now, I can't see what you're seeing. Are we rolling that?

CARLSON: No. We just see the building. And just so our viewers know, the explanation that I think is conventional is that there was a large tank of diesel fuel stored in the lower level of that, which caught fire, and the resulting fire collapsed the building.

JONES: Well, that's basically it, yes, but as we read in the FEMA report, it says here, and I put this in my paper, of course. "The best hypothesis, which is the only one they looked at, fire, has only a low probability of occurrence. Further investigation analyses are needed to resolve this issue, and I agree with that."

CARLSON: OK.

JONES: But they admit there's only a low probability, and if you look at the collapse, you see what I have studied is the fall time, the symmetry, the fact that it first dips in the middle. That's called the kink. Which is very characteristic, of course, of controlled demolition.

CARLSON: Professor, I am sorry that we are out of time ...

JONES: Whoa, one other thing I want to mention.

CARLSON: Ok. If you can hit it - hit it quickly.

JONES: OK. All right. Here we go. Molten metal in the basements of all three buildings.

CARLSON: Right.

JONES: And yet all scientists now reasonably agree that the fires were not sufficiently hot to melt the steel, so what is this molten metal? It's direct evidence for the use of high-temperature explosives, such as thermite, which produces molten iron as an end product.

CARLSON: OK.

JONES: It's very short time, but people will read the paper, then I talk about the molten metal, the symmetry of the collapse, and the weaknesses and inadequacies of the fire hypothesis.

CARLSON: Professor, we are going to have to leave it to our viewers who are interested enough to follow up to do just that. We appreciate you coming on, even if I don't understand your theories, we appreciate you trying to explain them. Thanks.

Watch 'The Situation with Tucker Carlson' each weeknight at 11 p.m. ET
2007 MSNBC Interactive

2007 MSNBC.com



051205explosives [wmv]
270404northtower [jpg]
270404southtower [jpg]
2750 degree fire melts bridge steel beams { April 30 2007 }
7 wtc collapse { November 29 2001 }
Ailing wtc rescue workers sue 1b insurance fund { July 18 2007 }
Body searched halted for gold search at wtc { March 9 2007 }
Bush insider said collapse was controlled demolishion
Bush says ksm planted explosives in a building
Comparing twin towers { October 23 2002 }
Debate over wtc fires draws experts { November 15 2004 }
Dislodged fireproofing key to wtc collapse
Engineering report released in trade center collapse
Engineers built wtc to withstand boeing jet { February 27 1993 }
Fire engineers challenge fed theory { May 27 2002 }
Fire wasnt hot enough to bring down towers says study { April 6 2005 }
Firefighters call giuliani 911 perfomance a disgrace
Fireproofing dismissed as wtc collapse cause { October 19 2004 }
First struck seconds to fall { February 24 2002 }
Giuliani accused on streets of allowing wtc deaths { May 29 2007 }
Giulliani caused firefighter deaths on 911 { January 22 2008 }
Giulliani promoted those who ran before towers fell
Graphic look { October 29 2002 }
Human remains search could move off site
Madrid building fire ap [jpg]
Madrid skyscraper burns 24 hours without collapse
Madrid windsor tower burns but no collapse { February 14 2005 }
Medical examiner says lung death from wtc debris { May 24 2007 }
Nist response to wtc controlled demolition accusations
Nist still cant figure out why wtc7 fell { June 2007 }
NY firefighters face questions on collapse { November 14 2003 }
Over 750 bone fragments found on deutsche bank building { October 26 2006 }
Planes hit tower weakest spot { September 12 2001 }
Report on trade center collapse emphasize fireproofing { April 5 2005 }
Search for human remains at wtc grows { October 27 2006 }
Silverstein pull wtc building 7 [mp3]
Stephen jones attacked on msnbc
Study faults bolts
Study suggests design flaws didnt doom towers { October 20 2004 }
Topple [jpg]
Towers fell almost free fall { April 30 2002 }
Why world trade center collapsed
Woman_in_blackhole [jpg]
Woman_wtc [jpg]
Wtc collapse evidence
Wtc collapse inquiry rules out design flaw
Wtc collapse secret { September 30 2002 }
Wtc huge pile driver { September 13 2001 }
Wtc officials recover more human remains { October 24 2006 }
Wtc pull building 6 [mp3]
Wtc structure built to withstand jet crash { February 27 1993 }

Files Listed: 51



Correction/submissions

CIA FOIA Archive

National Security
Archives
Support one-state solution for Israel and Palestine Tea Party bumper stickers JFK for Dummies, The Assassination made simple