News and Document archive source
copyrighted material disclaimer at bottom of page

NewsMine9-11inquiry — Viewing Item


Grassley investigate 911

Original Source Link: (May no longer be active)
   http://www.upi.com/view.cfm?StoryID=15052002-030848-8911r

http://www.upi.com/view.cfm?StoryID=15052002-030848-8911r

Senator seeks Sept. 11 FBI investigation
By Mark Benjamin and Nicholas M. Horrock
From the Washington Politics & Policy Desk
Published 5/15/2002 7:31 PM


WASHINGTON, May 15 (UPI) -- A Republican on the Senate Judiciary Committee asked the Justice Department's Inspector General Wednesday to investigate how the FBI handled an internal warning last summer that terrorists might be taking flight lessons in the United States, according to a letter obtained by United Press International.

Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, wrote Inspector General Glenn Fine Wednesday, warning that the FBI's "credibility is at risk."

In the letter, Grassley asked for an investigation into how the FBI handled a now-infamous July 2001 memo from the FBI's Phoenix, Ariz., field office recommending that the bureau keep an eye on flight schools, obtain visa information on enrolled pilots and coordinate a nationwide investigation. That memo reportedly stressed concern about a connection between Middle Eastern flight students in Arizona with Osama bin Laden.

FBI Director Robert Mueller told a Senate panel last week that memo likely did not make it to high levels of the FBI or the CIA and that the agency should have made it a higher priority.

"This memo has emerged as one of the most significant and alarming warnings that the FBI had before the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001," Grassley wrote. "It is essential that there be an outside review of this matter by your office to answer all outstanding questions, ensure accountability at the FBI and reaffirm the trust of the American people."

In a separate letter Wednesday, Grassley also called on FBI Director Robert Mueller to make the memo available to the public. "I strongly urge you not to invoke secrecy in the way the government so often does: as an excuse to prevent the release of embarrassing information," Grassley wrote.

The letters reflect increasing concern among Democrats and Republicans in Congress that the Bush administration is stonewalling congressional inquiries into whether U.S. intelligence agencies missed, bungled or ignored what appear to be important warning signs of a pending airline terror attack -- in the weeks prior to Sept. 11.

Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., this week also sent 19 pages of questions to Bush administration officials, mostly for FBI Director Robert Mueller, about U.S. intelligence actions prior to the Sept. 11 attacks.

The questions posed by Leahy, a Vermont Democrat, seek facts about:

-- How the FBI handled the July 2001 Phoenix memo.

-- Information on the August 2001 arrest of Zacarias Moussaoui, the alleged "20th hijacker," for visa violations after he raised the suspicions of an instructor at a flight school in Eagan, Minn. Leahy is particularly interested in FBI efforts to obtain information from Moussaoui, his computer, and his apartment.

-- Facts about a warning from French intelligence officials at least 10 days before Sept. 11 that Moussaoui had connections to radical Islamic extremists.

-- Press reports that in 1995 Filipino authorities warned the FBI that a Middle Eastern pilot trained at a U.S. flight school had proposed crashing a jet into federal buildings.

-- How the FBI has handled information that potential terrorists have taken advantage of U.S. flight schools. The FBI confirmed for United Press International this week that some individuals mentioned in the July 2001 Phoenix memo were not involved in the Sept. 11 attacks and are still under investigation.

Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Bob Graham, D-Fla., is also seeking a personal meeting with Attorney General John Ashcroft, for this week if possible, to demand "cooperation with enthusiasm" instead of "cooperation out of grudging necessity" on that committee's investigation. Republicans on the committee agree with Graham.

Early this year, President Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney both personally asked Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle, D-S.D., to limit any investigation to only the House and Senate Intelligence Committees -- the same investigation that Graham and some Republicans are complaining the administration is now stonewalling.

At the time, Daschle said "the vice president expressed concern that a review of what happened would take resources and personnel away from the effort in the war on terrorism." But Daschle added that the "the American people have a right to know what happened and why."

Leahy and Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, Judiciary Committee ranking member, in February asked for $1.5 million for their committee to conduct their own investigation. But Majority Leader Trent Lott, R-Miss, blocked the request, according to Leahy.

"Senator Hatch and I have made a joint request for additional funding to examine the events leading up to the Sept. 11 attacks and what steps are needed to make sure that our law enforcement is in a position not to let history repeat itself," Leahy said last week.

"That request has been blocked by Minority Leader Lott. An examination of FBI operations before 9/11 are essential, not to lay blame, but to learn lessons and to be in a position to evaluate the FBI reorganization plans."

Ron Bonjean, spokesman for Lott, said that the investigation should be left to the Intelligence Committee so that the Judiciary Committee can concentrate on confirming the president's judicial nominations.

"I realize that the House and Senate Select Intelligence Committees are conducting a joint review of factors and events that led up to the attacks and I appreciate their work," Grassley wrote to the DOJ Inspector General. "However, their investigation comes from a different perspective, and it certainly does not preclude the Judiciary Committee from carrying out its oversight responsibilities."

(UPI Congressional Bureau Chief Mark Benjamin and UPI Senior White House Correspondent Nicholas M. Horrock contributed to this report.)

Copyright 2002 United Press International




berger-incident
bush-interview
commission-failure
commission-recommendations
conflicts-of-interest
congress-report
dissent
hampering-probe
public-heaings
senator-graham-alleges-coverup
9 11 probe quit
911 attacks preventable panel head believes { December 19 2003 }
911 commission chairs son runs for new jersey senate { October 19 2006 }
911 inquiry fired
911 panel cites communication failures between nyfd nypd { May 18 2004 }
911 panel reaches deal on access to papers { November 13 2003 }
911 panel to get more access to memos
911 probe panel
911 victim families not taking bribe money
Air defense flaws detail in 911 panel { April 25 2004 }
Ashcroft blames clinton rules for 911 { April 14 2004 }
Ashcroft blames intelligence sharing wall { April 14 2004 }
Battle over 911 panels deadline intesifies { January 29 2004 }
Breaks on 9 11 truth commission
Bush disagrees with saddam 911 connection { June 17 2004 }
Bush grants commission extension { February 4 2004 }
Bush press conference during 911 hearings
Bushs 911 coverup { June 18 2003 }
Chair says attack was preventable
Chief assess blame but holds off on higher ups { December 19 2003 }
Cia report criticizes cia leaders actions { January 8 2005 }
Commission could subpoena oval office files { October 26 2003 }
Commission investigates FBI { April 13 2004 }
Commission tells of many warnings { July 25 2004 }
Commission votes to subpoena pentagon
Congressional investigation angers cia fbi
Conspiracy theories abound in 911 probe { December 29 2003 }
Deal 911 commision { November 15 2002 }
Failed put hijackers watch list { May 15 2003 }
Families seek curb probe officer
Grassley investigate 911
House 911 inquiry
Kean says 911 attacks could have been prevented { December 19 2003 }
Kean says 911 report will be surprising
Most families havent taken payoff fund { August 31 2003 }
News reporters ordered not to investigate 911
No iraq link to 911 says panel
Panel describes how attackers got money { September 11 2001 }
Panel grills alqaeda chiefs on 911 { May 12 2004 }
Panel has glimpse presidential briefings { November 16 2003 }
Panel has testy exchange with firefights police { May 18 2004 }
Panel may subpoena its summaries of bush briefings { January 31 2004 }
Panel plans hard questions for fbi doj { April 6 2004 }
Panel probes failures of air defenses
Panel requests documents { June 19 2003 }
Panel seeks declassification of 911 warning memo
Panel urged disciplinary { December 11 2002 }
Panel will sharply fault role of congress { July 22 2004 }
Report citing blame for 911 supressed till after election { October 19 2004 }
Secrets of 911
Tenet lies about not seeing bush in august 2001 { April 16 2004 }
Terrorism catchall too vague an enemy for war { July 23 2004 }
Top brass says no chance hijackers fly into pentagon { April 15 2004 }
Victims relatives press white house for sept 11 details { October 29 2003 }
Why does 911 inquiry scare bush { July 11 2003 }

Files Listed: 55



Correction/submissions

CIA FOIA Archive

National Security
Archives
Support one-state solution for Israel and Palestine Tea Party bumper stickers JFK for Dummies, The Assassination made simple